R O C K G R O U T

WATER TESTING FOR CEMENT GROUTING PURPOSES

For finding permeability and crack properties in a rock foundation.

by A.C.Houlsby, Grouting Engineer (Retired), Sydney, Australia

Water test gear

In this testing water under pressure flows outwards from a test hole. The quantity taken in test periods indicates relative permeability which is taken in conjunction with the type of water flow to enable decisions about the grouting. This type of testing should not be confused with testing of the chemistry of water which has an entirely different purpose and is not related to grouting, therefore is not dealt with in this programme..

There are two main types of water testing in relation to grout holes: EXPLORATORY TESTING, where permeability exploration of a site is carried out for design of the grouting, and GROUT HOLE TESTING, where each stage of every grout hole is water tested before grouting it. The grout hole testing is a simpler version of the exploratory test method. Both types are detailed here.

The following list shows links direct to details.

WATER TESTING IN GROUT HOLES:

WATER TESTING IN EXPLORATORY HOLES:

APPLICABLE TO BOTH TYPES OF TEST:


THE HARDWARE FOR DOING THE TESTS

Water test gear

Water test gear

TOP


WATER TESTING IN GROUT HOLES

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear

Water test gear


Now we have reached the end of this explanation abput water testing in grout holes.

TOP


THE LUGEON UNIT

The Lugeon unit of permeability is the most popular and relevant unit for grouting purposes. It is based on the type of water test shown above.

Definition of the lugeon unit:

  • 1 lugeon unit = 1 litre/m/minute at 150 psi

or put more formally:

  • 1 lugeon unit = 1 litre of water taken per metre of test length, per minute, at 10 bars pressure (150 psi approx)

or

  • 1 lugeon unit = 0. 0107620 cu ft of water taken per foot of test length per minute at 142 psi (this is exact conversion. 150 psi is usually used though)

In terms of "velocity"-type permeability units, very approximate calculated relationships are

  • 1 lugeon unit = 10 ft/year which is approx 1.3 x - 5 cm/second

To give a sense of proportion for the unit:

  • 1 lugeon unit is the type of permeability where grouting is hardly necessary.
  • 10 lugeons warrants grouting for most seepage reduction jobs.
  • 100 lugeons is the type of permeability met in heavily jointed sites with relatively open joints or in sparsely cracked foundations where joints are very wide open.

Tests at Other Pressures

Most water testing is done under different conditions to those. The length of the hole tested is usually more than 1 metre, and the definition pressure is frequently too high to use safely in weak rock foundations prone to move. Compensating adjustments are therefore made when calculating Lugeon values from water testing results. The formula is


        Lugeon units  =  litres/metre/minute 
                                 x   10 (bars)        
                                   actual pressure (bars) 
or 
       Lugeon units  =   0.01076 cu ft/ft/minute 
                                 x   142 (psi)        
                                   actual pressure (psi) 
Applying this to GROUT HOLE testing:

When the recommended test pressure of 15 psi [1 bar] is used, and measurements are in cubic feet and feet:

  • Lugeon value = 175.928 x cubic feet per foot per 5 minutes.

This value is usually read off tables.

When the test pressure is 1 bar and measurements are in litres and metres:

  • Lugeon value = 2 x litres per metre per 5 minutes

TOP



WATER TESTING IN EXPLORATORY HOLES

The overall concept is that the test method must indicate:

  • Whether the water flow through the cracks under test is essentially laminar or turbulent. The result reported for the test is strongly affected by this.
  • If the test is dilating the cracks.
  • If materials are being washed out or rock moved by the test water.
  • If voids are being filled by the water.

Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear

TOP

This testing appears complex initially, but a simple routine can be easily established such as:

These five different pressure runs are done immediately after each other. They can be denoted as A-B-C-B-A.

The lugeon value is then calculated for each of the pressure runs. Then the five values are inspected to determine the flow regime or testing event. In the examples shown below, bars are used to pictorially convey relative magnitudes, but once the concept is understood, the process of deciding which lugeon value to report for the test can be done entirely mentally.

Graph plots are also shown in the following boxes for illustrative purposes, but are not really necessary.

Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear Water test gear

On the diagram the pressure increments are shown in hatched bars. The manner in which pressure rises to a peak in the third run and then reduces, in a symmetrical pattern, can be noticed. The bars shown solid on the right portray the lugeon values calculated for each of the pressure increments. In this example, they are more or less the same value for each of the pressures. The implication of this is that the flow was generally laminar (i.e., smooth flow along cracks, without turbulence, usually the result of quiet flow in finer cracks), but not exclusively, of course, considering the mix of crack sizes and conditions met with in most test stages.

When flow is of this type, any one of the five lugeon values can be accepted as the result of the test and reported as such, or their average used.

TOP

Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent Water test turbulent

In this example the lugeon values for the various pressure increments are no longer the same. A symmetrical distribution with the lowest value occurring on the highest pressure is indicative of turbulent flow (i.e., rough, eddying, turbulent motion usually the result of fast flow in wider cracks). This lowest value should be reported as the result of the test. Note the considerable error that would result from averaging the values.


TOP

Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation Water test dilation

The pattern of values shown here is somewhat the reverse of the previous one. The peak pressure produces a much higher lugeon value than before or after it. This pressure has been sufficient to locally dilate cracks by compression of softer materials or by closure of adjacent parallel cracks. The dilation has been temporary, and for this reason the reported permeability of the stage should be that obtained for the lowest pressures, or alternatively for the medium pressures if these are less than for the low pressures, indicating that turbulent flow was occurring prior to the dilation.

TOP

Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout Water test washout

This shows permeabilities increasing as the test proceeds. They do not decrease when the pressure does. This indicates permanent washing out of joint filling materials, or movement of rock caused by the testing, followed by "propping" where rock fragments fall into joints and prevent closing after relaxation of pressure. Too much of this sort of thing indicates that test pressures are too high. The reported permeability can be taken as that measured for the final run (at low pressure); this presumes that the peak pressure bears some resemblance to eventual in-service pressures, which would produce somewhat similar results if not grouted.

TOP

Water test voids Water test voids Water test voids Water test voids Water test voids Water test voids Water test voids Water test voids

This is the reverse of the previous pattern. The lugeon values are progressively reducing, indicating that empty voids, cracks, and so on are being filled and that water cannot then progress further. Prudent action is to carry the test further (at low pressure) until the reducing trend ceases, indicating that all empty voids have become filled. Even better action is to saturate such a foundation before starting the test. The reported permeability should be the lowest measured; this is an indication of the flowthrough permeability once the voids are filled.

TOP

Water test pressure Water test pressure Water test pressure Water test pressure

TOP

Water testsum Water testsum

TOP

Water testexample Water testexample Water testexample Water testexample Water testexample Water testexample Water testexample Water testexample

TOP

REPORT FORM and ANALYSIS

For a form for recording the results of this type of water testing click on TRADITIONAL UNITS or in METRIC UNITS.

The data is automatically analysed on the form and a representative lugeon value for adoption as the result of the testing is suggested.

TOP


SOME INFO....

This is an abbreviated extract from Version 8.0 of the series of ROCKGROUT grouting programmes. The version is on DVD but is not yet publicly available.

The DVD contains the book Construction and Design of Cement Grouting together with the contents of this Web site and some additional matter.

Here is a suggestion: If you have reached this page without going to "HOME", then go there now to get access to the many pages listed there.

TOP

HOME

Revised March 2011.